Estimating the worldwide variety of people who don’t consider in a god or gods presents a fancy problem. Defining atheism itself varies throughout cultures and philosophical viewpoints. Some contemplate it a optimistic assertion of disbelief, whereas others view it because the absence of perception. This variation contributes to the issue in precisely quantifying the demographic. Moreover, social and political climates can affect people’ willingness to overtly determine as atheist, resulting in underreporting in surveys and censuses.
Understanding the prevalence of non-belief is essential for comprehending shifting social and cultural landscapes. It informs discussions on secularism, the function of faith in public life, and the safety of particular person freedoms. Traditionally, atheism has been stigmatized in lots of societies, resulting in persecution and discrimination. A extra correct understanding of the demographics might help tackle these biases and promote larger tolerance. Moreover, the information can be utilized to foretell future societal traits and to allocate assets to assist secular communities.
Accessible knowledge means that a good portion of the worldwide inhabitants identifies as non-religious, agnostic, or atheist. Surveys and demographic research provide various estimates, reflecting totally different methodologies and definitions. Elements reminiscent of geographic location, training stage, and socio-economic standing correlate with charges of non-belief. The next sections delve into particular estimates and the methodologies used to derive them, together with discussions concerning the challenges and limitations of such analysis.
1. International estimates fluctuate.
The query of how many individuals are atheist on the planet just isn’t answered with a single, definitive quantity, however fairly a spread. This variation is not a easy discrepancy; it is a reflection of deeper complexities in defining, measuring, and reporting non-belief throughout various cultures and political landscapes. The story of quantifying atheism is one marked by methodological hurdles and societal nuances that considerably skew reported figures.
-
Survey Methodology Issues
Survey design performs an important function. For example, asking instantly “Are you an atheist?” could yield totally different outcomes than asking about particular beliefs in God or increased powers. Some surveys enable for “agnostic” or “non-religious” responses, which can or could not embrace people who determine as atheist. The phrasing and out there choices instantly affect how people self-identify, resulting in discrepancies within the aggregated numbers. Think about a situation the place a survey lacks a “non-religious” possibility; some atheists would possibly choose the closest out there class, distorting the ultimate tally.
-
Defining Atheism is Elusive
The very definition of atheism is topic to interpretation. Is it the lively denial of God’s existence, or just the absence of perception? Some view atheism as a optimistic assertion, whereas others contemplate it a default place within the absence of proof. This definitional ambiguity complicates makes an attempt to categorize and depend atheists. If a research narrowly defines atheism as lively disbelief, it would exclude those that merely lack a perception, resulting in an underestimation of the general inhabitants.
-
Societal Strain Impacts Reporting
In lots of elements of the world, figuring out as an atheist carries important social stigma, starting from gentle disapproval to authorized repercussions. People could also be reluctant to overtly declare their atheism, fearing discrimination, ostracism, and even violence. This underreporting bias is especially pronounced in areas with sturdy spiritual traditions or authoritarian governments. Due to this fact, even probably the most meticulously designed survey can solely seize a fraction of the true variety of atheists, as many will select to hide their beliefs.
-
Regional Variations Form Perception
Secularization traits fluctuate significantly throughout geographic areas. Western Europe and East Asia typically exhibit increased charges of non-belief in comparison with different elements of the world. Historic components, ranges of training, and socio-economic circumstances contribute to those regional variations. A rustic with a protracted historical past of secular authorities insurance policies and a extremely educated populace is extra prone to have a bigger proportion of non-believers in comparison with a area the place spiritual establishments exert sturdy social management and entry to training is restricted.
The variations in international estimates for atheism usually are not merely numerical discrepancies; they inform a narrative of how perception, non-belief, and societal pressures intersect. Understanding the multitude of things that affect these figures helps to understand the complicated interaction between private conviction and societal norms in shaping the worldwide spiritual panorama. In the end, “how many individuals are atheist on the planet” stays a shifting goal, its true worth obscured by a mix of methodological limitations and human reticence.
2. Methodological challenges abound.
The pursuit of a exact determine for the world’s atheist inhabitants is a journey fraught with obstacles, not not like navigating a labyrinth in close to darkness. The challenges lengthen past mere knowledge assortment; they strike on the very coronary heart of how perception, non-belief, and societal norms intertwine, rendering a definitive depend elusive.
-
The Survey Says…Perhaps
Surveys, the first instrument for gauging spiritual affiliation, are removed from infallible. The framing of questions, the supply of response choices, and the cultural context by which they’re administered all contribute to potential biases. For example, a survey that explicitly asks “Are you an atheist?” could yield totally different outcomes in comparison with one which inquires about perception in God or membership in a spiritual group. The previous could elicit a direct response, whereas the latter depends on inference, doubtlessly overlooking people who don’t actively determine with a spiritual group however don’t explicitly disavow perception. The seemingly easy act of asking turns into a fancy train in interpretation, muddling the already murky waters.
-
The Shadow of Stigma
In quite a few societies, declaring oneself an atheist carries important social repercussions, starting from delicate disapproval to outright persecution. This actuality casts a protracted shadow over knowledge assortment efforts, as people could also be hesitant to disclose their true beliefs for worry of discrimination or ostracism. The result’s a systemic underreporting of atheism, skewing the figures and making a distorted image of the worldwide spiritual panorama. Think about a researcher trying to assemble knowledge in a area the place atheism is legally or socially condemned; the responses obtained would probably replicate a need to adapt fairly than an correct illustration of perception.
-
Defining the Indefinable
A elementary problem lies within the lack of a universally accepted definition of atheism itself. Is it the lively denial of God’s existence, or just the absence of perception? Does it embody agnosticism, which acknowledges the unknowability of God? These questions plague researchers, as totally different interpretations can result in vastly totally different estimates. Think about a research that defines atheism as the express rejection of God; it could inadvertently exclude people who passively lack perception or who determine as agnostic, thereby undercounting the true variety of non-believers.
-
Knowledge Deserts and Statistical Silos
The supply and high quality of information fluctuate considerably throughout the globe. Some areas lack complete surveys or censuses that embrace questions on spiritual affiliation, whereas others depend on outdated or unreliable info. This uneven distribution of information creates statistical “deserts,” the place researchers are pressured to depend on extrapolations and estimations, additional compounding the uncertainty surrounding international atheism figures. Moreover, knowledge collected by totally different organizations could also be incompatible as a consequence of variations in methodology or categorization, creating “statistical silos” that hinder makes an attempt to synthesize a unified international image.
The methodological challenges inherent in quantifying atheism usually are not mere technicalities; they symbolize elementary limitations in our means to seize the complexities of human perception. The shadow of stigma, the paradox of definitions, and the uneven distribution of information all conspire to obscure the true variety of atheists on the planet, reminding us that some questions could by no means yield a exact reply.
3. Social stigma’s affect.
The world holds its secrets and techniques shut, and maybe none extra tightly guarded than issues of religion, or the dearth thereof. When addressing “how many individuals are atheist on the planet,” probably the most rapid and pervasive barrier is not methodology or definition, however the very actual weight of societal judgment. Think about a researcher in a small, tightly knit rural neighborhood, the place church bells dictate the rhythm of life and dissent is whispered in shadows. Asking outright about atheism just isn’t a impartial act; it’s akin to demanding a public confession, one that would result in ostracization, lack of livelihood, and even violence. The implications, perceived or actual, ripple outwards, silencing voices and distorting knowledge.
Think about the case of nations the place blasphemy legal guidelines stay on the books, the place denying the existence of God is a criminal offense punishable by imprisonment or demise. In such environments, even probably the most ardent non-believer will probably profess religion to guard themselves and their households. The affect extends past authorized restrictions. Social pressures inside households, workplaces, and communities will be equally potent. A person could select to feign perception to take care of relationships, keep away from discrimination in hiring or housing, or just to navigate every day life with out fixed questioning or judgment. The consequence is a hidden inhabitants, a silent cohort whose numbers stay unknown and unacknowledged in official statistics. This phenomenon is not confined to any single area; it exists wherever non-belief is considered as a deviation from the norm, a risk to the social order. Understanding that is important as a result of “how many individuals are atheist on the planet” just isn’t a matter of pure counting, however fairly an evaluation of how reality will be suppressed by worry.
The sensible significance of acknowledging social stigma’s affect is twofold. First, it requires a reevaluation of present knowledge, recognizing that reported figures probably symbolize a major undercount. Second, it necessitates a extra nuanced method to analysis, one which prioritizes anonymity, employs oblique questioning strategies, and considers the cultural context by which knowledge is collected. Till the burden of social judgment is lifted, the true variety of atheists on the planet will stay a thriller, a testomony to the enduring energy of perception, and the equally highly effective human intuition for self-preservation.
4. Regional discrepancies exist.
The search to find out the worldwide variety of atheists encounters a major impediment: the world doesn’t uniformly embrace or reject spiritual perception. As an alternative, huge disparities exist from one area to a different, creating a fancy mosaic that confounds any try at a easy, common depend. These regional variations usually are not mere statistical anomalies; they’re reflections of distinctive historic trajectories, cultural norms, and socio-political climates that form particular person perception methods.
-
The Secular West vs. The Non secular East
Western Europe, with its lengthy historical past of secularism and emphasis on particular person freedoms, typically reveals increased charges of atheism and non-belief in comparison with many elements of Asia and Africa, the place spiritual traditions typically maintain a extra central and pervasive function in every day life. This divergence just isn’t unintended; it stems from centuries of philosophical and political developments which have regularly eroded the affect of spiritual establishments within the West, whereas reinforcing it in different areas. For example, the legacy of the Enlightenment and the French Revolution contributed to the secularization of European societies, fostering an surroundings the place questioning spiritual dogma turned extra accepted. Conversely, in lots of Asian and African nations, faith stays deeply intertwined with social id, household constructions, and authorized methods, making it tougher for people to overtly categorical non-belief.
-
Wealth and Schooling: Catalysts for Secularization?
Socio-economic components, reminiscent of ranges of wealth and training, typically correlate with charges of atheism. Wealthier and extra educated populations are likely to exhibit larger skepticism in direction of conventional spiritual beliefs, maybe as a consequence of elevated entry to info, larger publicity to various views, and a diminished reliance on faith for primary wants. Nevertheless, this correlation just isn’t absolute. Some extremely developed nations preserve sturdy spiritual traditions, whereas some impoverished areas exhibit stunning ranges of secularism. The interaction between wealth, training, and non secular perception is complicated and context-dependent, various considerably throughout totally different cultural and historic settings.
-
The Function of Authorities and Social Management
The political panorama performs an important function in shaping spiritual affiliation and non-affiliation. Authoritarian regimes that promote a selected spiritual ideology could suppress dissent and discourage the expression of non-belief, resulting in an artificially low reported variety of atheists. Conversely, secular governments that shield spiritual freedom and uphold the separation of church and state could create an surroundings the place people really feel extra comfy overtly figuring out as atheist. The diploma of presidency management over spiritual expression can have a profound affect on the accuracy and reliability of atheism statistics.
-
Cultural Norms and Social Strain
Even within the absence of direct authorities intervention, cultural norms and social stress can exert a robust affect on particular person perception methods. In communities the place faith is deeply ingrained in social material, people could really feel compelled to adapt to spiritual expectations, no matter their private beliefs. The worry of ostracism, discrimination, and even violence can deter people from overtly expressing non-belief, resulting in a hidden inhabitants of atheists who stay invisible in official statistics. The load of cultural expectations will be significantly heavy in collectivist societies, the place particular person autonomy is commonly subordinated to the wants of the group.
These regional discrepancies spotlight the inherent challenges in quantifying atheism on a worldwide scale. A single quantity can’t adequately seize the varied and nuanced realities of perception and non-belief throughout totally different cultures and societies. To really perceive “how many individuals are atheist on the planet,” one should delve into the particular historic, cultural, and political contexts that form spiritual landscapes in numerous areas, acknowledging the constraints of broad generalizations and embracing the complexity of human perception.
5. Definition ambiguity reigns.
The query, “how many individuals are atheist on the planet?” appears easy, demanding a numerical reply. But, the dearth of a universally accepted definition of atheism transforms the pursuit right into a labyrinthine quest. The anomaly just isn’t merely semantic; it instantly impacts the reliability and interpretation of any statistical estimate. Think about this: a researcher asks 100 people in the event that they consider in God. Some reply ‘no’ as a result of they actively reject the idea of a deity. Others reply ‘no’ as a result of the idea merely holds no relevance of their lives. Nonetheless others would possibly reply ‘no’ as a result of they determine as agnostic, discovering the query of God’s existence in the end unanswerable. Are all these people atheist? The reply relies upon fully on the definition employed.
This definitional murkiness has sensible penalties for knowledge assortment and evaluation. A research that defines atheism narrowly because the lively denial of God’s existence will inevitably produce a decrease estimate than a research that features anybody who lacks perception, no matter their causes. This discrepancy just isn’t merely a matter of educational debate; it impacts how societies understand the prevalence of non-belief, which in flip influences insurance policies associated to spiritual freedom, secularism, and social inclusion. A authorities counting on a flawed estimate would possibly underestimate the wants of secular communities, failing to offer sufficient assets for non-religious counseling companies or authorized protections towards discrimination. Conversely, an inflated estimate might gas anxieties amongst spiritual teams, resulting in requires stricter laws on secular expression.
In the end, the paradox surrounding the definition of atheism undermines the very basis upon which any international estimate is constructed. Till a clearer, extra broadly accepted understanding emerges, the query “how many individuals are atheist on the planet?” will stay not a easy question, however a fancy philosophical and sociological riddle. The true problem lies not in accumulating extra knowledge, however in refining the conceptual framework by which we perceive perception and non-belief within the twenty first century.
6. Secularization’s affect looms.
The specter of secularization hangs over the worldwide panorama, its shadow lengthening with every passing 12 months. This gradual shift away from spiritual dominance profoundly influences the reply to a seemingly easy query: “how many individuals are atheist on the planet?” It’s not merely a matter of people abandoning spiritual practices; it’s a tectonic shift in societal values, establishments, and worldviews, making a fertile floor for the expansion of non-belief.
-
Erosion of Non secular Authority
As secularization advances, the authority of spiritual establishments wanes. As soon as the only real arbiters of morality and data, they now compete with science, philosophy, and a myriad of secular ideologies. This decline in authority creates house for people to query spiritual dogma, discover various perception methods, or reject perception altogether. For instance, in lots of Western European nations, as soon as staunchly Catholic, church attendance has plummeted, and non secular teachings maintain much less sway over public coverage and private decision-making. This erosion instantly correlates with elevated charges of atheism and agnosticism, as people really feel much less compelled to stick to conventional spiritual norms.
-
Rise of Individualism and Autonomy
Secularization fosters a tradition of individualism and autonomy, empowering people to make their very own selections about perception and id. Now not sure by inflexible spiritual prescriptions, people are free to assemble their very own ethical codes and pursue their very own religious paths, or lack thereof. This emphasis on particular person autonomy resonates significantly strongly with youthful generations, who usually tend to embrace secular values and reject conventional spiritual affiliations. The rise of on-line communities and social media additional amplifies this pattern, offering platforms for people to attach with like-minded non-believers and problem spiritual narratives.
-
Scientific Developments and Rationalism
The rise of science and rationalism, typically intertwined with secularization, supplies various explanations for the pure world, difficult conventional spiritual accounts. As scientific understanding expands, the necessity for spiritual explanations diminishes, main some people to query the validity of spiritual claims. The success of science in addressing human issues and enhancing dwelling requirements additional strengthens its attraction, eroding the credibility of spiritual establishments that when held a monopoly on data. This shift in direction of rationalism contributes to a rising skepticism in direction of spiritual beliefs, fueling the rise of atheism and secular humanism.
-
Separation of Church and State
Secularization typically includes the separation of church and state, limiting the affect of spiritual establishments on authorities coverage and public life. This separation creates a extra impartial enjoying discipline for various perception methods, permitting non-religious viewpoints to achieve larger prominence. When governments prioritize secular values, reminiscent of equality, justice, and human rights, they create an surroundings the place people are free to precise their non-belief with out worry of discrimination or persecution. The separation of church and state just isn’t merely a authorized precept; it’s a cultural and political pressure that reshapes the spiritual panorama, creating house for the expansion of atheism and secularism.
The affect of secularization is simple. As spiritual authority diminishes, individualism rises, scientific developments problem conventional beliefs, and the separation of church and state turns into extra entrenched, the variety of people figuring out as atheist will probably proceed to develop. Nevertheless, it is very important keep in mind that secularization just isn’t a uniform course of; it unfolds in another way in numerous societies, formed by distinctive historic and cultural components. The connection between secularization and the variety of atheists is complicated and multifaceted, a testomony to the enduring energy of perception and non-belief within the fashionable world.
7. Knowledge limitations persist.
The story of quantifying atheism globally is akin to charting an unknown continent with incomplete maps. The phrase “how many individuals are atheist on the planet” seems easy, but behind it lies a major reality: dependable knowledge is scarce. Census knowledge, typically the spine of demographic research, ceaselessly lacks particular questions on spiritual non-affiliation. Surveys, whereas extra focused, grapple with self-reporting bias, significantly in areas the place atheism carries social stigma. The absence of complete, constant, and unbiased knowledge creates a void, forcing researchers to depend on estimations and extrapolations. These educated guesses, nevertheless, include inherent uncertainties, making the exact variety of atheists a perpetually shifting goal. The impact is evident: an incomplete understanding of a major phase of the worldwide inhabitants.
The significance of addressing this knowledge deficiency can’t be overstated. Correct demographic info is essential for knowledgeable policymaking, useful resource allocation, and social understanding. For example, if a authorities underestimates the variety of atheists in its inhabitants, it would fail to adequately shield their rights, tackle their wants, or acknowledge their contributions to society. Conversely, understanding the true scope of atheism can foster larger tolerance and acceptance, dismantling stereotypes and selling inclusivity. An actual-life instance lies in secular advocacy teams, which regularly battle to achieve recognition and funding because of the lack of concrete knowledge demonstrating the dimensions and affect of the non-religious inhabitants. The sensible significance of improved knowledge assortment extends past mere numbers; it empowers marginalized teams and promotes a extra equitable society.
In conclusion, the persistent knowledge limitations surrounding the depend of atheists globally usually are not mere technicalities however elementary obstacles to understanding a major demographic pattern. These limitations stem from a mix of insufficient knowledge assortment strategies, self-reporting biases, and definitional ambiguities. Overcoming these challenges requires a concerted effort to enhance survey design, guarantee anonymity, and foster a local weather of acceptance that encourages sincere self-reporting. Till then, the query of “how many individuals are atheist on the planet” will stay shrouded in uncertainty, hindering efforts to advertise inclusivity and knowledgeable policymaking. The pursuit of higher knowledge isn’t just an instructional train; it’s a ethical crucial.
Often Requested Questions
The query of how many individuals are atheist on the planet sparks appreciable curiosity. Introduced beneath are frequent inquiries surrounding the subject, addressed with an informative method.
Query 1: What constitutes “atheist” for international statistical functions?
The that means of “atheist” proves to be a fancy matter. Some surveys contemplate an atheist as somebody who explicitly denies the existence of God. Others make use of a broader definition, encompassing people who merely lack perception or determine as agnostic. This definitional variance contributes to the vary of estimates encountered.
Query 2: Why is a precise quantity so troublesome to establish?
Pinpointing a precise determine faces many challenges. One important hurdle is the social stigma related to atheism in sure areas. People could also be unwilling to overtly determine as non-believers as a consequence of potential repercussions, resulting in underreporting in surveys. Methodological variations throughout research additional contribute to inconsistent outcomes.
Query 3: Are there particular areas with increased reported charges of atheism?
Sure areas persistently report increased charges of non-belief. Western Europe and elements of East Asia typically present a larger proportion of people figuring out as atheist or non-religious in comparison with different elements of the world. This pattern is commonly attributed to components reminiscent of superior secularization, increased ranges of training, and distinct historic contexts.
Query 4: How do societal components affect the expression of atheism?
Societal components exert a considerable affect. In nations the place faith is deeply ingrained in social and political constructions, people could face important stress to adapt to spiritual norms, no matter their private beliefs. Conversely, secular societies have a tendency to offer extra space for open expression of non-belief.
Query 5: How dependable are the out there estimates?
The reliability of obtainable estimates varies. Whereas some research make use of rigorous methodologies and enormous pattern sizes, others are restricted by knowledge shortage or potential biases. Consequently, the figures needs to be interpreted with warning, acknowledging the inherent uncertainties.
Query 6: Does secularization correlate with rising charges of atheism?
Secularization typically correlates with rising charges of atheism. As societies turn into extra secular, the affect of spiritual establishments wanes, and people usually tend to query conventional beliefs. Nevertheless, the connection just isn’t at all times easy, and different components, reminiscent of socio-economic circumstances and political contexts, additionally play a job.
In abstract, estimating the worldwide inhabitants of atheists is an ongoing endeavor. A definitive, universally accepted determine stays elusive as a consequence of definitional complexities, social stigmas, and methodological limitations. Understanding these challenges is essential for decoding out there knowledge and appreciating the nuances of world perception traits.
Now, the dialogue will discover actionable insights and methods associated to those estimations.
Navigating the Murky Waters
The search to find out “how many individuals are atheist on the planet” is a voyage fraught with peril, very like navigating a ship by uncharted seas. Storms of social stigma, the shifting sands of definition, and the hidden reefs of information shortage threaten to capsize any try at a exact depend. But, the journey is price endeavor, for it illuminates the complicated interaction between perception, non-belief, and societal forces shaping our world. Listed here are some navigational instruments to help within the effort:
Tip 1: Acknowledge the Definitional Quagmire: The time period “atheist” just isn’t a hard and fast level on the map; it’s a fluid idea that morphs with cultural context and particular person interpretation. Acknowledge that some outline it because the lively denial of God, whereas others contemplate it a mere absence of perception. Any estimate should explicitly state its working definition to keep away from deceptive comparisons.
Tip 2: Chart the Waters of Social Stigma: Social stigma acts like a magnetic anomaly, deflecting true readings and distorting the information. Perceive that in lots of elements of the world, overtly figuring out as atheist carries important dangers. Make use of oblique questioning strategies, assure anonymity, and be aware of cultural sensitivities when accumulating knowledge.
Tip 3: Embrace Regional Nuance: The spiritual panorama just isn’t a flat expanse; it’s a tapestry woven with various threads of historical past, tradition, and politics. Acknowledge that charges of atheism fluctuate dramatically throughout areas, influenced by components reminiscent of secularization, training ranges, and authorities insurance policies. Keep away from generalizations and deal with understanding the particular context of every area.
Tip 4: Scrutinize Methodological Rigor: Not all surveys are created equal. Study the survey design, pattern dimension, and knowledge assortment strategies utilized in any research. Be cautious of biased questions, main response choices, and small or unrepresentative samples. Prioritize knowledge from respected sources with clear methodologies.
Tip 5: Acknowledge Knowledge Limitations: Knowledge shortage is a persistent impediment. Acknowledge the gaps in present knowledge and the uncertainties inherent in estimations. Keep away from presenting figures as definitive or absolute truths. As an alternative, body them as approximations inside a spread of potential values.
Tip 6: Contextualize the Numbers: Numbers alone inform solely a partial story. Present context by discussing the historic, social, and political components that contribute to charges of atheism in a selected area. Join the figures to broader traits in secularization, spiritual freedom, and social change.
Tip 7: Be Conscious of Political Implications: Estimates of the worldwide atheist inhabitants can have important political implications, influencing debates on spiritual freedom, secularism, and social inclusion. Strategy the subject with sensitivity and keep away from utilizing figures to advertise a selected agenda. Attempt for objectivity and steadiness in reporting.
Approaching the problem of “how many individuals are atheist on the planet” with these ideas can rework a deadly voyage right into a rewarding expedition. By acknowledging the complexities, embracing nuance, and exercising warning, it turns into potential to navigate the murky waters and arrive at a extra knowledgeable and nuanced understanding of the worldwide spiritual panorama.
With these navigational instruments in hand, it’s time to contemplate methods for a extra correct international evaluation of people with out spiritual affiliation.
The Uncountable Silence
The query, “how many individuals are atheist on the planet,” started as a numerical inquiry, an try to quantify a phase of humanity. It advanced right into a realization of the profound challenges embedded in such an endeavor. Numbers, it seems, can’t totally seize the complexities of perception, significantly when intertwined with social pressures, historic context, and the very act of self-identification. The estimates, as diversified because the methodologies employed, serve not as definitive solutions, however fairly as glimpses right into a hidden panorama. They trace on the energy of conviction, the braveness of dissent, and the enduring human battle to outline one’s place within the cosmos.
The search for a exact quantity in the end yields to a deeper appreciation of the human expertise. The uncounted and uncountable stand as a reminder that metrics alone can’t totally symbolize the tapestry of human thought. The silence surrounding atheism, born of worry or social constraint, speaks volumes. Maybe, the true process is to not enumerate, however to foster a world the place such silence is not essential, the place perception and non-belief alike will be expressed with out worry or prejudice. Solely then can we really start to grasp the total spectrum of human conviction.
